CMAJ • July 5, 2005; 173 (1). doi:10.1503/cmaj.1041744.
© 2005 CMA Media Inc. or its licensors
All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Juurlink, D. N.
Right arrow Articles by Detsky, A. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Juurlink, D. N.
Right arrow Articles by Detsky, A. S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Evidence-based Medicine Series

Letters
Correspondance

Kappa statistic

David N. Juurlink* and Allan S. Detsky{dagger}

Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ont.;* Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ont.{dagger}

In their excellent overview of a common statistical measure of agreement, Thomas McGinn and colleagues1 suggest in Table 1 that values for the kappa statistic range from 0 to 1. However, negative values of kappa are also possible.2 Although unusual in practice, a negative kappa statistic results when agreement occurs less often than predicted by chance alone. This may indicate genuine disagreement, or it may reflect a problem in the application of a diagnostic test. Readers and researchers who encounter a negative kappa statistic should be aware of its implications, rather than blaming mathematical or typographic errors or computer "gnomes."

References

  1. McGinn T, Wyer PC, Newman TB, Keitz S, Leipzig R, Guyatt G, for Evidence-Based Medicine Teaching Tips Working Group. Tips for learners of evidence-based medicine: 3. Measures of observer variability (kappa statistic). CMAJ 2004;171(11):1369-73.[Free Full Text]
  2. Kramer MS, Feinstein AR. Clinical biostatistics. LIV. The biostatistics of concordance. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1981;29:111-23.[Medline]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Juurlink, D. N.
Right arrow Articles by Detsky, A. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Juurlink, D. N.
Right arrow Articles by Detsky, A. S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Evidence-based Medicine Series